Bringing financial visibility and governance to a growing contracting business.
Centuries Contracting needed to move from instinct-driven decisions to structured financial reporting, project-level profitability tracking, and governance that could support a growing team and project portfolio.
CONTEXT
Where the business stood
Centuries Contracting had grown steadily on the strength of its reputation and the founder's deep industry expertise. But as the number of concurrent projects increased and the team expanded, the informal systems that had worked at a smaller scale began to break down.
The business was profitable in aggregate, but nobody could say with confidence which projects were making money, where cash was being consumed, or whether the current trajectory was sustainable.
CHALLENGE
What needed to change
- Project-level profitability was invisible — the business knew total revenue but not which projects made money
- Cash flow was unpredictable, with payment cycles and cost overruns creating constant pressure
- Governance gaps emerged as the team grew beyond the founder's direct oversight
- No structured management reporting — decisions were based on instinct rather than data
- Approval workflows were informal, creating risk as project values and team size increased
DIAGNOSE
Understanding the financial and governance gaps
Bayshire conducted a comprehensive financial process review, project costing analysis across active and recently completed projects, and a governance assessment covering decision-making authority, approval workflows, and risk management practices.
The diagnostic revealed that cost allocation was inconsistent across projects, there was no standard method for tracking variations and change orders, and the business lacked the reporting infrastructure to support timely decision-making.
DESIGN
Designing the reporting and governance framework
Bayshire designed a management reporting framework that gave leadership monthly visibility into project-level P&L, company-wide cash flow, and key operational metrics. A project-level P&L structure was created to standardise how costs, revenue, and margin were tracked across all engagements.
Approval workflows were designed with clear thresholds — procurement, variation orders, subcontractor commitments, and payment authorisations each had defined approval paths based on value and risk.
BUILD
Implementing the financial infrastructure
Bayshire configured the ERP system to support project-level cost tracking, automated invoice matching, and real-time budget monitoring. Dashboards were implemented to give the founder and project managers immediate visibility into project health, cash position, and margin performance.
A monthly reporting cadence was established with standardised templates covering project performance, cash flow forecasts, and exception reporting. Each report was designed to drive decisions, not just document history.
SCALE
Building for portfolio-level management
With project-level visibility established, Bayshire built a multi-project portfolio view that aggregates performance data across all active engagements. This allows leadership to see total exposure, resource allocation, and margin trends across the entire business — not just project by project.
Risk-adjusted forecasting was introduced to account for the inherent variability in construction projects, and a board reporting package was created to support governance as the business grows beyond founder-led decision-making.
OUTCOMES
Verified results
[VERIFY METRIC]
Project profitability visibility
Percentage of active projects with real-time P&L tracking.
[VERIFY METRIC]
Cash flow forecasting
Improvement in forecast accuracy over a rolling 90-day window.
[VERIFY METRIC]
Reporting cadence
Time from month-end close to management report delivery.
[VERIFY METRIC]
Governance compliance
Adoption rate of structured approval workflows across all projects.
All metrics are pending final verification. Bayshire does not publish unverified outcomes.
Discuss a similar business challenge
Every engagement starts with a diagnostic conversation — no pitch decks, no generic frameworks. Just an honest look at what needs to change and how to change it.
Start Your Diagnosis